Critically appraise ‘Rickard, C.M., Webster, J., Wallis, M.C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M.R., French, V., Foster, L., Gallagher, P., Gowardman, J.R., Zhang, L., McClymont, A., & Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of periphery
Critically appraise ‘Rickard, C.M., Webster, J., Wallis, M.C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M.R., French, V., Foster, L., Gallagher, P., Gowardman, J.R., Zhang, L., McClymont, A., & Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of periphery
Critically appraise ‘Rickard, C.M., Webster, J., Wallis, M.C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M.R., French, V., Foster, L., Gallagher, P., Gowardman, J.R., Zhang, L., McClymont, A., & Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized controlled equivalence trial. Lancet, 380, 1066-1074.The critique should focus on the methodology, results, implications for clinical practice and further research. Use the structured format for critique provided on the vUWS site as a guide for the essay. Please choose the correct critique checklist(eg. Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D.(2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement:updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Open Medicine, 4(1):E60.) for the research design of the study being evaluated.
Please follow the marking criteria for the assignment.
The conceptualization of the question or problem is sound. Includes a clear, relevant statement about the importance of the research question/problem to nursing (ie something that is a nursing responsibility).
Critique of methodology and key aspects of the research paper are addressed using the CONSORT checklist (each item). Critique is articulated clearly, concisely and uses appropriate research terminology. Contains correct identification of the methodology used in the research. Critique is relevant and accurate and focuses on the major areas of strengths and/or weaknesses of the research. The critique uses appropriate and accurate research terminology. The writing style demonstrates the use of sophisticated vocabulary and accurate grammar and the spelling is accurate. Critical analysis of findings is evident. The key findings of the study are presented.
Conclusions are drawn and implications for health professionals and further research are highlighted Conclusions based on the research finding are stated. The potential significance of the research findings for health professionals is clearly and comprehensively presented. Suggestions for further research are clearly stated.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Critically appraise ‘Rickard, C.M., Webster, J., Wallis, M.C., Marsh, N., McGrail, M.R., French, V., Foster, L., Gallagher, P., Gowardman, J.R., Zhang, L., McClymont, A., & Whitby, M. (2012). Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of periphery completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.